Good morning! It has been 358 days since the first documented human case of COVID-19. We are one week short of a year.
There was some big political news over the weekend; hopefully this means that the period of political uncertainty will be short so that we can focus on fighting the pandemic again soon.
Focusing on one headline today; things are looking bad in the US, and the pandemic did not end with the election. In fact, the virus doesn’t care about the election at all.
As usual, bolded terms are linked to the running newsletter glossary.
Keep the newsletter growing by sharing it! I love talking about science and explaining important concepts in human health, but I rely on all of you to grow the audience for this:
Now, let’s talk COVID.
COVID in the US is getting worse
Look at recent trends in cases in the US:
This is a bad trend. A week or two ago, I saw that there were about 80,000 new daily cases and was warning people that it would be 160,000 by late November. I now think we are on track to beat my prediction, because exponentials are horrible.
In my home state of New York, here is the current trend:
I’m concerned by those rising numbers. Very concerned. New York has kept excellent control of the pandemic after being an early hotspot, but this could change in a matter of weeks. Look at the last time we went above 2500 daily new cases; it was in mid-March. Now, at that time, testing in the state was much worse, so it’s not directly comparable, but we need to be cognizant of how quickly those 2500 cases turned into 10,000 per day. It took about two weeks. While I am hopeful we will keep control of things, we need to watch the next two weeks carefully.
What am I doing to cope with the pandemic? This:
Celebrating an end to election day (finally) without being in crowds
I was concerned to see large crowds gathering in New York to celebrate the end of the election counts and the calling of a presumptive winner; not because I don’t think people should celebrate if they like the results, but because I think these crowds are dangerous to see forming when trends are not good in the country and state overall.
Instead, I watched the festivities from inside, and I got everything I needed out of it.
We really do need to be careful, everyone.
Join the conversation, and what you say will impact what I talk about in the next issue.
Also, let me know any other thoughts you might have about the newsletter. I’d like to make sure you’re getting what you want out of this.
This newsletter will contain mistakes. When you find them, tell me about them so that I can fix them. I would rather this newsletter be correct than protect my ego.
Though I can’t correct the emailed version after it has been sent, I do update the online post of the newsletter every time a mistake is brought to my attention.
No corrections since last issue.
Thanks for reading, everyone! Have a great week.
See you all next time.
Always,
JS
I've been wondering if social distancing would result in reduced spread of other diseases, like flu. Is there any evidence of that?
In the SNL cold open, a maskless Jim Carrey and Alec Baldwin, both ~60 years old, stood right next to each other arm in arm. I don't expect you to know exactly what protocols SNL is following, but even if testing right before the show I can't imagine this is particularly wise given testing error rates and rising covid rates in NYC. Is there a way they could be doing this that's legitimately safe?